AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Que es el chivalry code3/23/2023 As Stubbs says “the thegn seems to be primarily the warrior gesith”-the gesithas forming the chosen band of companions ( comites) of the German chiefs ( principes) noticed by Tacitus-“he is probably the gesith who had a particular military duty in his master’s service” and he adds that from the reign of Athelstan “the gesith is lost sight of except very occasionally, the more important class having become thegns, and the lesser sort sinking into the rank of mere servants of the king.” It is pretty clear, therefore, that the word cniht could never have superseded the word thegn in the sense of a military attendant, at all events of the king. But the word thegn itself, that is, when it was used as the description of an attendant of the king, appears to have meant more especially a military attendant. Sharon Turner suggests that cniht from meaning an attendant simply may have come to mean more especially a military attendant, and that in this sense it may have gradually superseded the word thegn. In a tertiary sense the word appears to have been occasionally employed as equivalent to the Latin miles-usually translated by thegn-which in the earlier middle ages was used as the designation of the domestic as well as of the martial officers or retainers of sovereigns and princes or great personages. In a secondary sense cniht meant a servant or attendant answering to the German Knecht, and in the Anglo-Saxon Gospels a disciple is described as a leorning cniht. But some time before the middle of the 12th century they had acquired the meaning they still retain of the French chevalier and chevalerie. Of these the primary signification of the first was a boy or youth, and of the second that period of life which intervenes between childhood and manhood. The words knight and knighthood are merely the modern forms of the Anglo-Saxon or Old English cniht and cnihthád. Round has done much to explain the introduction of the system into England, its actual origin on the continent of Europe is still obscure in many of its most important details. “The growth of knighthood” (writes Stubbs) “is a subject on which the greatest obscurity prevails”: and, though J. For the more important religious as distinguished from the military orders of knighthood or chivalry the reader is referred to the headings St John of Jerusalem, Knights of Teutonic Knights and Templars. The first of these aspects is discussed under the headings FeudalismĪnd Knight Service: we are concerned here only with the second and third. It may be regarded in the first place as a mode or variety of feudal tenure, in the second place as a personal attribute or dignity, and in the third place as a scheme of manners or social arrangements. These two words, which are nearly but not quite synonymous, designate a single subject of inquiry, which presents itself under three different although connected and in a measure intermingled aspects.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |